A sensible argument from Agnew (2010), noted that strain theory is good apparatus to measure why individual engaged in the act of terrorism, though there is a need to carefully study these trends to know the kind of crime it exhibits. In brief, this hypothesis contends that terrorism is more likely when individuals encounter aggregate strains’ that are follows; high insignificance, with civilians, mostly affected; unjust; as well as inflicted by considerably more powerful among others, especially with whom individuals from the stressed entirely have a weak tie. These aggregate strains improve the probability of terrorism due to the activate negative emotions on the people, scale back group action and capacity to adapt through lawful as well as military channels, support the social learning of terrorism, add to a collective learning and reaction (Agnew 2010, 132). He also argues that when there are no grievances there will be no terrorism, as the main cause of terrorism is grievance’s. When looking at the different terrorist organization you should notice that their grievances is writing boldly on their action in term of the strains they are passing through. This statement is obvious through their online magazine or video on their website (Agnew 2010).