John Stuart Mills utilitarianism theory is a defense of utilitarian ethics that is based off the point that you can judge weathers an action is morally right or wrong by the amount of pleasure or pain it produces

John Stuart Mills utilitarianism theory is a defense of utilitarian ethics that is based off the point that you can judge weathers an action is morally right or wrong by the amount of pleasure or pain it produces. To understand what to do morally we must learn as leaders how to judge our own actions and how they affect others in the organization. Mills states that actions are right as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Mills also states that it is measurable for the fact that happiness brings upon pleasure or as the reverse of happiness in producing pain.
In my positioning on the utilitarianism theory, I stand in regard to it not being a relevant theory to utilize in today’s economy. In utilitarianism, it is an obvious outcome where one can feel in dilemma about the common happiness of a group of people so-called ‘general happiness’ or his/her own way of happiness. It would be positively contributed if and only if both of the happiness has a common motive. Else, it makes a gap between the community, society or in any group of people. The critics that Mills utilitarianism takes on the role of being an elitist as who’s to say I wouldn’t choose a life of endless money supply even if I died at the age of 60 compared of living forever but being poor. In this scenario, I have money to splurge till I die at the age of sixty bringing in what I would think an unbeatable amount of pleasure compared to the alternative action. In this scenario, you have to also factor in the time since that over time the pleasure of being poor but living forever will out measure being rich and dying. Utilitarianism is what you call “pigs” since they would be referred to as just pleasure seekers, and not caring about how others might be affected.
When you initially read the theory of utilitarianism you are stuck with the aspect that you are able to do bad/illegal things as long as pleasure outweighs the pain. As a leadership standpoint is difficult to actually apply utilitarianism theory since you have to basically figure out how it would affect the stakeholders. So, since everybody has a different perspective on pleasure, and you as a leader must figure out what pleases them. Alongside with being difficult to carry out the theory it so time-consuming with the number of calculations you would have to conduct to see if the actions produce more pleasure then pain. I work for HEB were we have rules that apply to everybody so for instance lets presume a majority of people would be happier not wearing uniforms, or not having to come in on time, or take longer brakes. As a leader, I must allow these things so my team is happier and to still have a following. Basically, what I’m trying to say is that there is no sense of control you are trying to please everybody at the expense of the stakeholders. We are in the degree to becoming the future manager/leaders and in the theory of utilitarianism, thee will come a time where you will have to sacrifice your own happiness or others to achieve the greater good.
In conclusion, my position of the utilitarianism theory is that pleasure although can be measured is not one-sided people have different perspective over happiness and making the moral decision would be so difficult when having to take the general ideology of what pleases them.

x

Hi!
I'm Dora

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out
x

Hi!
I'm Barry!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out